DOS Games Discussion

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:43 am**

Shuddup you, I was talking to Tinman :evil:

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:49 am**

tinman47 wrote: RAM: 1982 MB

How you come to that?

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:00 am**

1024+512+256=1892

Maybe it was a typo?

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:32 am**

An extra 256MB on a AMD Turion64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52 ?
OMG.

Now yeah, maybe he uses a USB stick as extra RAM.

*Edit
Maybe we should split those last posts into a 'TinMan47's weird memory lounge' topic in General.
LOLZ

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:13 am**

Yeah, that'd be a great idea!

NOT!

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:32 am**

tinman47 wrote:Processor: AMD Turion64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52 (I have 2 of them.)

So your computer has 4 processors? Isn't that a bit overkill?

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:47 am**

means he has 2 processors each with 2 cores...

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:57 pm**

Mmm! Quad-core with XP 32x

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:00 pm**

Its great,Ill send you my comp through mail.

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:18 pm**

franpa wrote:means he has 2 processors each with 2 cores...

Which would be like 4 processors

Posted: **Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:47 pm**

yes but physicaly its only 2 processors each a dual core, neither is a quad core, larry used the term quad core wrongly.

Posted: **Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:54 am**

2 processors, each dual core, that's quad core(remember, this is Tinman we're talking to)

And yes, it's overkill!

This reminds me I gotta check out them prices on the quad-core persessors!

Posted: **Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:19 pm**

2 dual cores does not equal a quad core (it does equal 4 cores tho)

quad cores are inferior to dual core processors at single threaded programs.

Posted: **Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:44 pm**

franpa wrote:..quad cores are inferior to dual core processors at single threaded programs.

No Franpa, they are equal if compared to the same clockrate dual and single core procs.
They simply use one core if the software isn't developed with paralellism in mind.

When compared with single thread software to the newest single core systems they will be slower, but that's only because a new single proc system has a much higher clockrate.

Compare them with a single/dual core with the same clock rate and they win (a little).
When benchmarked they usually perform a small bit better, because they are mounted in the newest systems(mobos-fastest RAM, and so on...).

And if I'm wrong, it means I didn't understand what the IT minions from Nixdorf told me.

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:09 am**

Let's see what I understand of this stuff... I have a Logitech laser mouse... Logitech speakers... Samtron screen... 114 GT hard disk... and Windows XP. Dunno about the others tuff.

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:15 am**

Aw, poor you, you don't have a keyboard?

It must be hard handwriting with your mouse!(since you don't have a microphone either

)

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:29 am**

Maybe he uses an onscreen keyboard at the bottom of his screen, ya know, the kind you use with your mouse pointer .
It only increases my respect for him, not easy in use those things.

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:30 am**

not at all, I just click the letters on a Window!

Ooh, now I see! There IS a logo there. Yep, Logitech keyboard it is.

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:30 am**

dosraider wrote:Maybe he uses an onscreen keyboard at the bottom of his screen, ya know, the kind you use with your mouse pointer .
It only increases my respect for him, not easy in use those things.

Yeah, but you can't make fun of him using that!

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:36 am**

greencosmos wrote:<strike>not at all, I just click the letters on a Window!</strike>

Couldn't help noticing that you first tried to cross out those words, but you apparently didn't know how to do it.
Quote my reply and remember it for the next time.

Pffffff, kids .......

DOS Games Discussion

Tell us about your computer!